COI Committee Member Resources
The Conflict of Interest Committee is made up of 12-18 voting members and a chair. Both faculty and academic staff may be members, although faculty serving as Deans or Associate Deans may not be regular voting members of the committee. Members represent a wide range of disciplines and colleges on campus. The committee seeks to maintain a balance of clinical and non-clinical researchers, of individuals engaging in entrepreneurial activities and not, of representatives from larger and smaller colleges and schools, and of men and women. The current members come from the following colleges and schools:
Agricultural and Life Sciences
Letters and Science
Conflict of Interest Program Manager
201 Bascom Hall
Conflict of Interest Specialist
201 Bascom Hall
The UW-Madison COI Office is responsible for initial review of all financial disclosures by all investigators and determines whether any meets the definition of significant financial interest (SFI). If so, the COI Office and COI Committee membership will evaluate whether the SFI could directly and significantly affect the design, conduct, or reporting of federally funded or human subjects research or whether the financial interests of the outside entity could be directly and significantly affected by the research. The COI Office and/or COI Committee membership presents an evaluation for COI Committee discussion and action. The COI Committee indicates that a financial conflict of interest (FCOI) exists by majority vote of the eligible members.
Under federal regulations, the UW-Madison is required to develop management plans for SFIs that are determined to be a financial conflict of interest (FCOI), including those of sub-recipient investigators.
The UW-Madison is also required to monitor compliance with the management plan. If the UW-Madison identifies an SFI that was not disclosed or reviewed in a timely manner, the COI Office will, within sixty (60) days, review the SFI, determine if an FCOI exists and implement an interim management plan, if needed. In cases of non-compliance, the COI Office will also complete a retrospective review and submit a Mitigation Report if bias is found.
Review criteria include: a) the research activities of an individual making an outside activities report, b) whether the activity is reportable on the Outside Activities Report (OAR), c) the value of the financial interest associated with an activity, and d) whether the activity is on-going or has ended. The following review criteria are used.
The COI Committee reviews and manages outside activities of individuals who are listed as principal investigator, co-investigator, or senior/key personnel on federally funded research or human subjects research administered by the UW-Madison. Specifically, one of the two following criteria must be true:
- The individual’s position at the UW-Madison would allow him or her to affect the design, conduct, or reporting of federally-funded research, or
- The individual is a principal investigator (PIs), co-investigator, or other senior/key personnel on human subjects protocols reviewed by UW-Madison IRBs and is (a) a UW-Madison employee, (b) a UW-Madison student, or (c) a UW-Madison agent (e.g. an individual who is not an employee but holds an appointment at UW-Madison). The UW-Madison COI Committee does not review or manage outside activities of non UW-Madison employees or students, or individuals who do not otherwise hold a UW-Madison appointment.
At the request a Dean’s Office or a UW-Madison IRB, the COI Committee may also review the outside activities of any investigator and provide advice on the existence of an FCOI.
The COI Committee only reviews activities that are disclosable on the annual OAR. A detailed description of disclosable and nondisclosable activities is available on the Outside Activities Reporting Web site and in Quick Reference Guide 3 of the Guidance Document.
Value of financial interest
The COI Committee reviews activities that meet or exceed the following financial thresholds:
- Compensation and/or ownership in a publicly-traded company that, either individually or combined, equals $5,000 or more in a calendar year.
- Compensation of $5,000 or more from a privately held company in a calendar year.
- Any ownership interest in a privately-held company.
- Any leadership position, where leadership positions are defined as positions with fiduciary responsibility including senior managers (presidents, vice presidents, etc.), and members of boards of directors. Membership on a scientific advisory board is not a leadership position.
University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents policy, UWS8, requires individuals to disclose all activities from the previous calendar year on the OAR and to update throughout the year as appropriate, and federal regulations require update of the OAR within 30 days of acquiring a new SFI. The COI Committee evaluates outside activities disclosed in the most current version of the OAR available at the time of preparation of the review meeting agenda.
The COI Office should assign disclosed outside activities that do not meet the criteria for review to “no management” status.
The COI Office should classify activities that an individual states to have ended before the OAR is filed as “no management.”
Committee members should recommend that any activities concluded to be complete at the time of review be classified “no management.”
No management financial interests
While some outside activities meet the criteria for review, the COI Office or COI Committee may determine that these do not require management and assign them to “no management” status. Such activities include:
- Salary, royalties, or other remuneration received from UW-Madison or affiliated entities (i.e., UW Hospital and Clinics, the VA Hospital, the UW Medical Foundation);
- Royalties generated by intellectual property rights arising out of university employment that are assigned to organizations created to manage such rights on behalf of UW-Madison, for example, Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and Wisconsin Center for Educational Products and Services;
- Income from seminars, lectures, or teaching engagements sponsored by a government agency, a university, an academic teaching hospital, a medical center, or a research institute that is affiliated with a university;
- Income from service on advisory committees or review panels for a government agency, a university, an academic teaching hospital, a medical center, or a research institute that is affiliated with a university;
- Travel related to institutional responsibilities that is reimbursed or sponsored by a U.S. government agency, a U.S. university, academic teaching hospital, or medical center, or a research institute that is affiliated with a U.S. university.
- Interests of any amount in investment vehicles, such as mutual funds and retirement accounts, as long as the investigator does not control the investment decisions made in these vehicles.
While assessing the need for management, the COI committee considers whether an outside activity or financial interest has a “nexus” with the individual’s research activities at the UW-Madison.
An outside activity has a nexus with an individual’s research activities if the outside activity arises from or relies upon the academic expertise that qualifies that individual to participate in federally funded research or human subjects research and the outside activity or interest could directly and significantly affect the individual’s research. The potential for conflict with an outside activity or financial interest is strengthened by other relationships between the individual or his or her immediate family and the business entity associated with the financial interest or outside activity.
Management condition summary
The COI Committee uses a standardized management plan. The management plan is posted on the COI web site. A management plan template is also included in Appendix C of the Guidance Document.
Terminating a management plan
When an investigator ends his or her relationship with an outside entity for which a management plan was issued, he or she should update his or her OAR to reflect the change in their relationship. The termination process is as follows:
- An investigator files an updated OAR indicating that the relationship has ended.
- The COI Office presents a summary of the information provided in the request for termination of a management plan for consideration by the full COI Committee at its monthly meeting.
- If the COI Committee determines the plan is no longer necessary, the committee will vote to terminate the management plan,
- COI Committee staff informs the investigator in a letter that a management plan has been terminated. If the individual's original management plan covered more than one entity, the staff will update the individual’s management plan to reflect any new committee determinations and the management plan cover letter will note which entities are no longer covered by the plan.